Category: edci338

In terms of PLNs and professional growth, twitter always seems to get the credit. I am not personally on Twitter; I am generally far too shy to interact with strangers on the internet. I do concede that it seems to be so great for PLNs because unlike many other social networks it is almost entirely discussion-based. Of course, pictures, videos and gifs all play a role but the primary mode of communication on Twitter is words. The guest this week however made me consider a further aspect I don’t previously include in my PLN, podcasts. I listen to quite a few podcasts, some of the more local and others with broader learning-based subject matter. Although these aren’t necessarily helping me build connections, they are helping me build knowledge and in some cases my exposure to incredible individuals who are knowledgeable and influential in their field. Oftentimes these are on subjects completely outside of my personal interests, but their passion and interest draw me in and I come out a more well-rounded person. In my mind this is the goal of a PLN, to broaden your horizons and expose you to new things and ideas. Even though I will likely never be working in, fire ecology, for example, but the knowledge I have gained on the subject due to a podcast doesn’t mean that that won’t be useful throughout my career and life.

            In terms of whether my PLN can grow my professional development post-course, I think that it can if I put time and effort into growing it as I grow myself both personally and professionally. The beauty of PLNs is that you have a lot of control over the people you engage with, the content you see and the subject matter you focus on. Previously in this course, there has been discussion on how including people and content adjacent to your field can be extremely beneficial. Diversity can be injected in many ways and that is one of them, and it is ultimately beneficial for all to use the internet and PLNs to “overcome the different cultural, but also social, economic, and political barriers.” (Giudice et al., 74) I was to change directions I think it would be more about building up into that new field rather than purging it of all those previous connections. PLNs are what you make of them, and the time and care you put into them will reflect in the connections and professional opportunities that are open to you.

Works Cited

“EDCI PODCAST – 2021–10-24 Mo Amir.” YouTube, uploaded by Jesse Miller, 24 Oct. 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgoDet6pwaI.

Giudice, Del Manlio, et al. “From Information Society to Network Society: The Challenge.” Social Media and Emerging Economies: Technological, Cultural and Economic Implications (SpringerBriefs in Business), 2014th ed., Springer, 2013, pp. 71–88, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02490-5.

Media literacy can be a misleading term, but as Julie Smith so adeptly put it, it is “the constant critical questioning of all the media that we consume.” (“EDCI 338 – MEDIA LITERACY with JULIE SMITH” 7:59–8:04). This doesn’t refer to having to criticize all the media we consume, but rather a practice of stepping back and regarding it from a subjective perspective to establish its relevance and accuracy. While the internet is a wealth of knowledge it is also a wealth of misinformation, and without media literacy skills individuals find themselves sucked into a cycle of at best misleading and at worse dangerous and harmful content. Media literacy can be approached in many ways, but I was struck at how similar a skill it is to the critical thinking skills that were taught to me in school. Critical thinking in a classroom where you’re objectively analyzing and making judgments is the same as doing it at home or in the workplace when you consume media. Although we may have not been teaching media literacy, we’ve been teaching those skills for a long time it’s only a matter of applying them.

Unfortunately, media literacy is often written off. This is partly due to the idea that we as individuals are smart enough to figure out what is true for ourselves rather than being taught this, but also because the internet and media are a comparatively new aspect of our world and evolving constantly. It is easy with social media to fall into the trap of forgetting to consider employing media literacy. Much like the news cycles, social networks want us to engage and stay on their site and the best way for them to do that is to show us what we like and want to see. Unfortunately, this has created these enormous echo chambers, which are incredibly polarizing and divisive. A wide variety of varied perspectives in a PLN can help prevent this “echo chamber”, keep those media literacy skills sharp and foster discourse rather than division.

 Works cited

“EDCI 338 – MEDIA LITERACY with JULIE SMITH.” YouTube, uploaded by Jesse Miller, 6 June 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=57r3-aEnci0.

Diversity as a term has begun to get a bad reputation over the last decade, and in many ways, it has often been something that people have historically feared. However, diversity is a gift to everyone who supports and engages themselves with it and in some ways even those who don’t. With diversity comes a wider pool of knowledge and understanding for all parties involved, because diversity and inclusion ultimately sets the stage for collaboration. This is also important because we as humans are more likely to revert to what is comfortable, and for many of us the people we grew up with and the environments we’re familiar with are those where we stay.

The internet and PLNS present an opportunity for individuals to look beyond their own experience, an act that seems simple but has the possibility of breaking down long held class and education barriers and open our world up for more of the population. PLNs are also adept at adjusting their delivery depending on their audience. Different individuals learn in different ways, or may be drawn to different forms of media. Digital PLNs have the unique ability to be multimedia and reach all these individuals in the way that best suits them and their learning needs.

In a PLN, diverse voices are incredibly important for getting a broader more global perspective but those advantages do not just exist on that scale but are relevant on a more local stage as well. In a community scale we can have incredible diversity, and establishing a PLN that discusses issues that are relevant to all and brings forth different perspectives and experiences can create enormous unity and understanding in a world that can feel very polarized. Markiel Simpson and his background was the perfect network in order to launch a campaign. His experience in BC housing is very relevant, and his unique voice as a young black Canadian only add further credit to his experiences and thoughts. For Simpson, twitter has been a huge advantage towards building his PLN and a platform in which to share his voice and experience. Clark and Aufderheide commented that “People come in as participants and leave recognizing themselves as members of a public— a group of people commonly affected by an issue, whatever their differences about how to resolve it.” (59). The power the public has as a unit is much more significant than the power we have as individuals, and harnessing PLNs as a way in which to bring together those from different perspectives and walks of life together into that more powerful unit.

Works cited

Jansen, S., et al. “A New Vision For Public Media.” Media and Social Justice, edited by Jessica Clark and Patricia Aufderheide, 1st ed., London, United Kingdom, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, pp. 55–67.

For public figures, there are some additional challenges or pressures associated with being involved in PLN’s. However, there are also many benefits. If you’re a public figure it is generally easier to engage with experts and other public figures, this not only benefits their learning but should they choose to share that information further it can benefit everyone who is a part of their network or whose network they are apart of. The disadvantages are most notably the lack of space to make mistakes. Though mistakes are a natural part of learning, those in the public eye receive a great deal of backlash or can even risk causing harm when they make them in that public space. For those of us who are not public figures, it can be more difficult to form good PLNs.

Employers will occasionally create PLNs for their employees which can be very helpful but do also have some disadvantages. First and foremost, the advantage is a PLN created by your place of work integrates all of your coworkers so you get some online and in-person integration which can be hugely beneficial. Additionally, you presumably already have a relationship and understanding with coworkers and communication and learning can be much smoother. However, there are also some negatives. Primarily, that you’re somewhat limited in both sources and expression. Depending on the diversity of your place of work there may not be much exposure to varied perspectives and experiences. In terms of limitation of expression, there are certain perspectives you yourself will not be able to share due to your PLNs integration with your workplace.

If you do choose to build a PLN on your own, it is important you’re careful to verify and explore the individuals you follow as well as choose those who share openly their mistakes and their sources. Most who have been creating content for their own PLN for a long time are transparent about their research process to avoid spreading misinformation, and it can also be useful to wait and think before posting to avoid snap decisions without proper consideration for truth. Experts are also a great source for information, but it is still wise to consider being wary of taking anything at face value until you know the source is an accurate one.

One of the many beautiful aspects of the internet is that it allows you to be connected to incredibly educated, experienced and intelligent people at the click of a button. Experts on almost every subject imaginable and the information they provide is attainable for the average person now more than ever, and this has an enormous effect on personal learning networks. Therefore, I think if someone was aiming to create a social media campaign on a subject, the first step would be to build a PLN that encompasses a wide breadth of knowledge and experience by those who already engage with the subject matter. While I have spoken a great deal on the accessibility of experts and academics, I think it is also important to build a network that includes peers and for some subjects’ everyday people.

For example, if I was to create a social media campaign around feminism and women in STEM fields, my first instinct would be to reach out to women in my life that have pursued careers in those fields and add them to my PLN. After that I would begin searching for other individuals who speak about this subject or live it, beginning with larger public figures and organizations involved like The American Association of University Women or Jessica Malaty Rivera an epidemiologist. Other Instagram accounts also focus on women in STEM and would be fantastic additions. Finally, it would be important to approach the individuals and resources I integrated to make sure there was a wide range of voices. As with any field, women in stem are not homogenous and it is incredibly important to make sure I’m getting input and experience from women of all colours, nationalities, backgrounds and sexualities as well as non-able-bodied women and those who fall on the lgbtqa+ spectrum and may identify better with non-binary or other gender identities. Presumably, this campaign is to make a difference for the better, and that can only really be achieved by having a broad inclusive idea of the challenge.

The more I think about inclusion in education, the more perplexed I become by the idea. As Moore writes, “The reality, however, is that there is no answer. There is no one way to be inclusive. (11) This does not mean that inclusion is not possible, but rather that depending on who you are, where you come from and who you work to include, the way you approach it will change. I often think of the British Columbia education system for learning disabilities, which I have experienced firsthand. I received a formal Individual Education Plan when I was in grade four, although I was getting extra help much earlier. Looking back, and having learned about inclusion as an adult, I can only hope that our approach has improved over time.

First and foremost, I often think about how I was pulled out of class regularly for more personalized help making me miss a lot of instruction time and singling me out in my class. I have only a vague memory from this period, as I was very young but I wonder now how much extra help this actually provided when I was missing class content from my own grade and additional time exposed to French the language I was supposed to be learning. As many educators have now realized, separating students from their class is not true inclusion (“The Evolution of Inclusion: The past and future of education” )

Another aspect that concerns me today is that I was expected to be my own advocate within the system. As soon as I grew up and reached middle school, it was up to me to make sure my teachers knew about my IEP and again, any help I received was outside my classroom. At the time, as a child, I didn’t mind, but now I wonder how beneficial it was. I got extra help, for the most part, which I certainly needed and if the system was trying to help me with my challenges, isn’t that enough? It is certainly important that children with different learning needs receive extra help, but surely there is a way to create an educational environment that allows all types of learners to express themselves and provides opportunities to meet those different needs. As a child, I did not feel that the education system was there for me, but rather that I was separate from my class and ‘different, which is exactly the opposite of what an inclusive educational environment should do.

My current PLN is somewhat diverse, but could certainly be improved. I would say I am most certainly more of a listener and than a talker because I tend to listen only and engage very little. As for being in “a silo”, I tend to lean much towards content related to education, working with children and similar subject matter and while I think there is less division there than in other areas I could likely use more varied thoughts and opinions in that content. PLNs are an excellent way to integrate diversity into your understanding of the world and topics you find interesting. Personally, I could benefit from voices from the broader world, as I seem to follow primarily western individuals.

PLNs have the ability to broaden your idea of inclusion and diversity because they can expose you to a wider range of diversity than you might see in everyday life. Diversity exists on all scales, and that includes globally which is hard to conceptualize for many. In terms of my professional setting, I think inclusion is an ongoing practice and probably always will be. I currently work with young children, and learning to provide as much support and openness to diverse children and their needs is a process. I do think that the fields of childcare and education are some that are having to be the most proactive about inclusion and diversity but still have their challenges. For example, it is a heavily female-dominated field a fact that we should definitely be exploring how to change.

References

“EDCI 338 – 20 Minutes Moore.” YouTube, uploaded by Jesse Miller, 30 May 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeSV0rUl1bA.

Moore, Shelley. One Without the Other: Stories of Unity Through Diversity and Inclusion (Reimagining Inclusion: The ONE Series (1)) (Volume 1). HighWater Press, 2016.

“The Evolution of Inclusion: The past and future of education.” YouTube, uploaded by Five Moore Minutes, 1 Oct. 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQgXBhPh5Zo&feature=youtu.be.

PLN are especially important to education for a multitude of reasons, but it is particularly in that it creates opportunities for anyone to be teachers and anyone to be their students. Used correctly, almost any platform can be an educational one. Twitter is a common source for communication and other discourse, Instagram can create incredible profiles of visual learning and concepts and I remember using Facebook to coordinate group projects and study groups in high school. Open learning resources have become opportunities for those who are not able, whether that be financially or geographically to learn about almost any subject matter from experienced academics and professionals through websites and other online or even physical course material. Part of the beauty of these websites is that we all start on equal footing, something that certainly cannot be said for most other aspects of life.

The internet is the only place in the world where a 16-year-old can have as much influence as a rich 75-year-old man and in many ways is “reshaping the ways that humans create, store, and distribute knowledge” (Couros,114) This is an incredible asset for young people especially, who can often struggle to have their voice effectively heard before they can vote or participate in most elections and democratic processes. As a large component of the population, the internet and social media allow them to share their experiences and their concerns and teach while they are being silenced as our leadership has deemed them too young. I don’t think people my age and younger appreciate this enough, our voice, alone and collectively is louder than it maybe ever has been

However beautiful this is as a concept of an equal playing field for learning and collaboration; it is unfortunately not untarnished by the inequality of the outside world. Social media websites like TikTok have faced backlash recently when its algorithm was obviously shown to be favouring European features, and those who come from upper-class families have an easier time gaining a wider audience more quickly. It is unfortunate, but though the platform is equal at its very base the chance to be successful or share your ideas is not. There is also the aspect that many marginalized or even young people cannot truly use social media as an authentic voice due to repercussions in their work. I have personally worked with organizations that have strict social media policies while I am employed, and people of colour have to be particularly cognizant of their social media activity as they regularly face racism that deems black culture “unprofessional.”

Works cited

Veletsianos, George. Couros, Alec. “Developing Personal Learning Networks for Open and Social Learning.” Emerging Technologies in Distance Education (Issues in Distance Education), Edmonton, Athabasca University Press, 2010, pp. 109–28.

In the event that an employer was to examine my V+R map, I don’t think I would be too concerned with what they saw. There are certainly some areas of my online presence that I wouldn’t necessarily want to show to potential employers but my easily accessible online presence is both pretty “locked down” so to speak, and also relatively appropriate for work. My social media pages are private, and even after gaining access to them, all the content is innocuous. This is partly because of the work I’ve done throughout my life, which often blurs the lines between coworkers and friends pretty heavily. Partly due to this, and partly due to my tendency to delete or private old content that I posted when I was younger my social media and general online presence is very appropriate for work. An employer would certainly be able to tell some things about me from my V+R map, my age for one. I’m old enough that people seem to disagree whether I am a millennial or a generation z, and I think my social media use is somewhat of a clue for that. Although irregularly, I still use Facebook which something younger than I am more or less don’t do. I don’t use TikTok, though I know a wide variety of people do including those both older and younger than me. Also interesting is that there are several services I use that are meant for more social aspects that I don’t use for that, but instead for more personal use.

As the Internet has become a more mainstream aspect of everyday life it has flourished as a way to communicate. Social networks have become a popular choice for people looking to connect online with their friends and family.  Additionally, people use social networks to connect to communities that share their interests and to even use these communities to deepen their knowledge and understand of the subject in question.  From a professional or even educational perspective, social networks present many unique opportunities for more “self-guided” learning experiences.

Despite all the positives surrounding the communication aspects, we still know very little of what drives an individual to so actively participate in social networking the way we see today. It is common for the motivation to be professional, as networking is both convenient and wide-reaching on the internet. However, aside from professional uses, there is a great deal of discussion coming forward about the addictive aspects of many social networking sites. Many social networking sites are designed specifically to keep the user coming back and staying, whether it is good for their health or not. There is also the matter of individuals frequently having both a professional and personal online presence. While professional presences are often very curated, personal ones are usually more “free form”. This is fine until the two identities converge or intersect, and depending on the content in the personal sphere it may cause issues in one’s professional life.

With any public activity, one could argue there is a degree of risk, however, the risks associated with maintaining an online presence are frequently undervalued. This is primarily due to the permanence of the internet. While you may make some poor choices in “real life”, it is much less likely for those choices to resurface in 10 years than it is for them to resurface on the internet.

There is also the matter of an online presence being much further reaching than a physical one. This can be really beneficial, as discussed earlier with finding those who share your interests or even being more informed on global matters. However, one also has to consider privacy. That online presence that can easily make you knew friends, can also put your personal information into the hands of those who will use it for ill. An easy comparative frame of reference for a regular person having an internet presence and a “physical” social presence is the difference between introducing yourself at a small house party and standing up on a stage at a huge concert. They may be doing and saying the same information, you have much less of an idea of who hears it and what they may do with that information. While I personally have very little, if any, professional presence in the social networks I use I can still draw the comparison between more “free form” personal use and that which is a bit more curated. I first began using Facebook when I was 13, only four years after it became available for public use. As a result, a lot of the older content that I posted is, well, that which one would expect a 13-year-old to post. This isn’t necessarily bad, but it certainly is not what I would post now. A more current social network I use is Instagram, which I got in 2015. I have always been very particular about what I post there, mostly due to the visual aesthetic and as a result, it is very curated.

References

• Boyd, Danah. “Networked Privacy”. Surveillance & Society, vol 10, no. 3/4, 2012, pp. 348-350. Queen’s University Library, doi:10.24908/ss.v10i3/4.4529.
• “Eric Stoller – What Is Digital Identity?”. Youtube.Com, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0RryRbJza0.
• Rajagopal, Kamakshi et al. “Understanding Personal Learning Networks: Their Structure, Content And The Networking Skills Needed To Optimally Use Them”. First Monday, vol 17, no. 1, 2012. University Of Illinois Libraries, doi:10.5210/fm.v17i1.3559.
• “What Is A Personal Learning Network (PLN)?”. Futurelearn, 2021, https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/learning-network-age/0/steps/24644.